Overview:

• Recognition and registration are amalgamated rather than ideally differentiated; there is a focus on legal registration with few to no means for existential recognition.

• The requirements for registration seem appropriate although there is subjectivity in the language used that could be misused against applicant groups such as “domicile in the country”; the existence of a longevity quota suggests that this language could be misused to restrict the registration process.

• The provision for registered associations to “freely organise their internal structures” suggest that unregistered do not have this right which intimates government involvement in the internal affairs of unregistered groups.

• The requirement for groups to apply for building permits seem appropriate although ambiguity as to the process is concerning; the degree of discrimination in the process is yet to be determined; ownership of all religious buildings constructed prior to 1992 is also dubious.

• Even only a degree of mandatory registration existing in the system is a violation of the Bielefeldt provision.

Positive elements:

• Investigations into human rights abuse cases are made by the SEGOB and there is a system of offices established to deal with religious affairs.

Recommendations:

• Establish provisions for existential recognition in addition to the provisions for legal registration.

• Revoke restrictive policies.

• Establish a nationwide recognition agency.